<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMPR Year Two. What&#8217;s Hot, What&#8217;s the Bother?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/</link>
	<description>Blogging the revolution of brand democratization with an emphasis on transparency and radical trust.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 06:52:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: collin</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/comment-page-1/#comment-49751</link>
		<dc:creator>collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/?p=685#comment-49751</guid>
		<description>Got it. Thanks for pointing out that issue JT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it. Thanks for pointing out that issue JT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTPratt's Blogging Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/comment-page-1/#comment-49748</link>
		<dc:creator>JTPratt's Blogging Mistakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/?p=685#comment-49748</guid>
		<description>My link is buried (no text after the anchor) after the last &quot;Neues von der Social Media News Release&quot; link.  Would you mind fixing it?  Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My link is buried (no text after the anchor) after the last &#8220;Neues von der Social Media News Release&#8221; link.  Would you mind fixing it?  Thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: collin</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/comment-page-1/#comment-49705</link>
		<dc:creator>collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/?p=685#comment-49705</guid>
		<description>Drew... no problem mate... you are the guy, years ago, who first showed me RSS readers... that set me on this path... I always appreciate your insights :-)

Dave/Parker
Of course, I agree with you all in the strategy/tactic point. If your business objective is to get a message out and your identified  demographic participates and consumes content in social media, the SMPR is a tactic that may work well for you.

&quot;Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.&quot; Sun Tzu.

For me, the strategy comes in when deciding how to blend it into the communications mix to meet your objectives. There seems to be no end to the debate over what functions are turned on and off, and what insights are to be gained. If the strategy is sound, these details fall into place one by one. 


This process is nothing new to experienced digital developers. Part of this process is a healthy debate over these details that can effect the communication objectives considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew&#8230; no problem mate&#8230; you are the guy, years ago, who first showed me RSS readers&#8230; that set me on this path&#8230; I always appreciate your insights <img src='http://www.radicaltrust.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Dave/Parker<br />
Of course, I agree with you all in the strategy/tactic point. If your business objective is to get a message out and your identified  demographic participates and consumes content in social media, the SMPR is a tactic that may work well for you.</p>
<p>&#8220;Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.&#8221; Sun Tzu.</p>
<p>For me, the strategy comes in when deciding how to blend it into the communications mix to meet your objectives. There seems to be no end to the debate over what functions are turned on and off, and what insights are to be gained. If the strategy is sound, these details fall into place one by one. </p>
<p>This process is nothing new to experienced digital developers. Part of this process is a healthy debate over these details that can effect the communication objectives considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/comment-page-1/#comment-49683</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/?p=685#comment-49683</guid>
		<description>Aye, good post indeed Collin. And thanks for taking a look at the CNW SMR. 

I agree completely with David Jones in that the SMR should be seen as a tool, not a strategy. Just as a traditional press release was a tool designed to give information (in this case, plain text) to the newspaper journalists of yesterday, the SMR should be seen as a tool to provide content to the multimedia journalists (ahem, bloggers) of today. 
A PR campaign shouldn&#039;t stop at simply issuing an SMR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye, good post indeed Collin. And thanks for taking a look at the CNW SMR. </p>
<p>I agree completely with David Jones in that the SMR should be seen as a tool, not a strategy. Just as a traditional press release was a tool designed to give information (in this case, plain text) to the newspaper journalists of yesterday, the SMR should be seen as a tool to provide content to the multimedia journalists (ahem, bloggers) of today.<br />
A PR campaign shouldn&#8217;t stop at simply issuing an SMR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/comment-page-1/#comment-49621</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/?p=685#comment-49621</guid>
		<description>good post, partner. There&#039;s entirely too much worrying about how to create an smpr and not enough examples being shoved out there.  Clients are warming up to the idea as a centrepiece to a social media outreach program, so we&#039;re likely to see a broader use of these tools over the next little while. 

The Avon version is the fourth one I&#039;ve been involved with and I&#039;m really liking the features and the ease of updating we&#039;ve built into the template.  Let&#039;s keep evolving, but not forget this is a tool, not a strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post, partner. There&#8217;s entirely too much worrying about how to create an smpr and not enough examples being shoved out there.  Clients are warming up to the idea as a centrepiece to a social media outreach program, so we&#8217;re likely to see a broader use of these tools over the next little while. </p>
<p>The Avon version is the fourth one I&#8217;ve been involved with and I&#8217;m really liking the features and the ease of updating we&#8217;ve built into the template.  Let&#8217;s keep evolving, but not forget this is a tool, not a strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2008/10/03/smpr-year-two/comment-page-1/#comment-49615</link>
		<dc:creator>drew Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/?p=685#comment-49615</guid>
		<description>hey collin thanks for the hattip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey collin thanks for the hattip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

