<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 3 Types of Social Media Communities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/</link>
	<description>Blogging the revolution of brand democratization with an emphasis on transparency and radical trust.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:24:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: collin</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-34903</link>
		<dc:creator>collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/#comment-34903</guid>
		<description>There is no hierarchy here, these are meant to be categories of want, not size. 

You are right to identify that there are sub communities within the bigger platforms that may belong in different categories. However, examples listed to provide a &quot;general&quot; context for the concept, not the rule itself. And size (in my estimation) has nothing to do with categorizations. 

Size metrics belong to &quot;vibrancy&quot;, not type. 



...


As for your address book.... well... 
I can&#039;t predict the future, but I think facebook is going to be around for a long time... it is going to be hard to pull people out of it, there are already thousands of sites trying... however, 

you never know....

thanks for the comments!
collin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no hierarchy here, these are meant to be categories of want, not size. </p>
<p>You are right to identify that there are sub communities within the bigger platforms that may belong in different categories. However, examples listed to provide a &#8220;general&#8221; context for the concept, not the rule itself. And size (in my estimation) has nothing to do with categorizations. </p>
<p>Size metrics belong to &#8220;vibrancy&#8221;, not type. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>As for your address book&#8230;. well&#8230;<br />
I can&#8217;t predict the future, but I think facebook is going to be around for a long time&#8230; it is going to be hard to pull people out of it, there are already thousands of sites trying&#8230; however, </p>
<p>you never know&#8230;.</p>
<p>thanks for the comments!<br />
collin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-34895</link>
		<dc:creator>The Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/#comment-34895</guid>
		<description>I might challenge your hierarchy here... Trying to jam Facebook and MySpace into your &quot;three communities&quot; seems a bit of a push. Wouldn&#039;t it be more accurate to place what you call &quot;colossal social networks&quot; in a realm above sites like LinkedIn, Firefighter Nation and Flickr?

Aren&#039;t Facebook and MySpace really just &#039;sub-internets&#039;; closed, owned, shrink-wrapped generalized social networking systems offering up &#039;across the board&#039; social networking tools under their own umbrella?

Both FB and MS provide tools [albeit not quite as rich] that allow for the building of your three communities within their &#039;closed&#039; systems...

I&#039;m finding it both an interesting; and a frustrating time here on the internet. On one hand; I continue to maintain my &quot;meta&quot; online social network; i.e. my various email address books, my blogs, and now my photo and video sharing tools... On the other hand; I&#039;m being forced, albeit by convenience, to generate versions of this old network within these, hmmm... &quot;shrink wrapped&quot; versions of... the internet.

I&#039;ve pretty much migrated from MySpace to Facebook even though this has caused me to leave behind those who&#039;ve not bothered... 

I&#039;m almost certain that within 18 months I&#039;ll be tempted by yet another &#039;sub-internet&#039;... OR perhaps, in the end my &quot;social network&quot; will have dissolved into the odd friend who [separately] still bothers with their MySpace or Facebook accounts; AND the old standbys, my email address book...

Are we there yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might challenge your hierarchy here&#8230; Trying to jam Facebook and MySpace into your &#8220;three communities&#8221; seems a bit of a push. Wouldn&#8217;t it be more accurate to place what you call &#8220;colossal social networks&#8221; in a realm above sites like LinkedIn, Firefighter Nation and Flickr?</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t Facebook and MySpace really just &#8217;sub-internets&#8217;; closed, owned, shrink-wrapped generalized social networking systems offering up &#8216;across the board&#8217; social networking tools under their own umbrella?</p>
<p>Both FB and MS provide tools [albeit not quite as rich] that allow for the building of your three communities within their &#8216;closed&#8217; systems&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m finding it both an interesting; and a frustrating time here on the internet. On one hand; I continue to maintain my &#8220;meta&#8221; online social network; i.e. my various email address books, my blogs, and now my photo and video sharing tools&#8230; On the other hand; I&#8217;m being forced, albeit by convenience, to generate versions of this old network within these, hmmm&#8230; &#8220;shrink wrapped&#8221; versions of&#8230; the internet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pretty much migrated from MySpace to Facebook even though this has caused me to leave behind those who&#8217;ve not bothered&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost certain that within 18 months I&#8217;ll be tempted by yet another &#8217;sub-internet&#8217;&#8230; OR perhaps, in the end my &#8220;social network&#8221; will have dissolved into the odd friend who [separately] still bothers with their MySpace or Facebook accounts; AND the old standbys, my email address book&#8230;</p>
<p>Are we there yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon canada</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-34178</link>
		<dc:creator>jon canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/#comment-34178</guid>
		<description>http://www.snl.com/InteractiveX/article.aspx?CDID=A-6510105-12907&amp;KPLT=2

Social networking - from mainstream to &#039;lame&#039;stream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.snl.com/InteractiveX/article.aspx?CDID=A-6510105-12907&amp;KPLT=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.snl.com/InteractiveX/article.aspx?CDID=A-6510105-12907&amp;KPLT=2</a></p>
<p>Social networking &#8211; from mainstream to &#8216;lame&#8217;stream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-34123</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicaltrust.ca/2007/09/11/the-3-types-of-social-media-communities/#comment-34123</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The 3 Types of Social Media Communities...&lt;/strong&gt;

The hardest part in the development of an online community is earning credibility. Credibility is the currency of social media and the most successful platforms employed a humble-beginnings approach, maturing slowly to its tipping point. Some communiti...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The 3 Types of Social Media Communities&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The hardest part in the development of an online community is earning credibility. Credibility is the currency of social media and the most successful platforms employed a humble-beginnings approach, maturing slowly to its tipping point. Some communiti&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
